| I love that little story. I wish I
had written it (to the best of my
knowledge it was written anonymously by
someone involved in health care in
England some twenty or thirty years ago).
For me, the poem illustrates our approach
to life in this second half of the 20th
century, not only as individuals, but as
societal and/or political entities. It
points out that increased technological
capability and scientific understanding
does not necessarily (in all
circumstances) improve on common sense.
Just because we can do it, doesn't mean
it has to be done. Bigger is not
necessarily better, etc. It also brings
up, for me at least, the seeming
inability of our rational, scientific and
technological minds to understand the
lessons that nature teaches us with each
passing day and every changing season;
that in the polarity between darkness and
light, there is the balance; that in the
cycles of life and death, there is
harmony; that in the incredible diversity
of life there is equilibrium; that even
as there is a way, there is not one way.
There are, in fact, many roads to Mecca. Nature
has taught us over and over again that as
different as things are, they are not and
never have been, and never can be
separate. While philosophers throughout
the ages have speculated on the wholeness
that religion espouses as absolute
(constantly contradicting themselves in
the process, I might add-the supreme
being-intelligence-consciousness-has many
names, ) our greatest scientific minds
are only beginning to fathom the
connections and relationships that
permeate both the physical and the
metaphysical universe.
Correspondingly, we simple folks lose
ourselves in the deluge of the noise
created by the above discussion, taking
advantage of every excuse we can to
separate ourselves one from the other
(whether we are American or Russian,
capitalist or communist, Christian or Jew
or Moslem, black or white, young or old,
man or woman, conservationist or
developer, rich or poor, ad nauseum), in
which separation we create the rationale
to negate anothers experience, emotions,
thought processes and ultimately their
lives.
"Anyone who tells me that my
emotions or desires don't exist is in
effect telling me that I don't
exist," says Abraham Maslow. To say
that what any one of us thinks or feels
is wrong and not worth thinking and
feeling implies perhaps that one's life
may not be worth living or at least that
one is a threat to my way of thinking and
feeling and living. So say the
politicians and the preachers of
separatism. We forget that we are all
first human beings. How else could we go
on killing each other? How else can we go
on living in a way which denies any other
human being, man, woman, or child, their
life? How else can we go on feeding our
fear, ignorance and insecurity while
starving our spirit and denying our
dreams and our visions?
We cannot live a lie! We can no longer
exist in the contradiction between what
we say in our words and deeds as an
expression of our fear and separation,
and what we hear in the cry of our hearts
expressing connectedness and wholeness
and the recognition that we are One.
George Leonard has observed that our
existence has always tempted the human
race with extremes. (I like to substitute
the word "choices.") Today, we
are a world culture standing on the
razor's edge, between catastrophe and
transformation. How's that for a choice?
Catastrophe - not just a loss of life,
but the potential for the end of all life
on this planet - transformation - peace
throughout the world, and the end of
hunger, the end of world terrorism,
security and prosperity for everyone.
"Of course," you might say,
"but it is not that easy. There are
so many problems. It's so complex, and
besides, what can I do?" In my mind
there are not so many problems. There
are, however, many symptoms which are
expressions of one major problem, the
life that I mentioned earlier. And the
solution is not really so complex or
difficult. It's in the choices that you
and I make every moment of our lives. The
way we live, how we treat our neighbors,
how we spend our money, whether or not we
truly take responsibility for ourselves
and our society and our country and our
world. It is possible to recognize that
the products of fear and separation, in
all their forms and with all the problems
and difficulties, they present, seen from
a different perspective, are the perfect
set of circumstances, the perfect
opportunity, the perfect steps within
which we can begin to express in real
terms connectedness and wholeness, and if
you will, oneness. Let's experiment,
let's take a risk. It would seem a much
safer bet than the risk we're taking now.
End of Part One
Copyright the Windstar
Foundation, all rights reserved.
Windstar Journal,
Winter 1986, Reprint by permission only.
|